🔗 Share this article

Whenever a major awards ceremony draws close, you'll find a demand to include of new categories to honor overlooked contributions and satisfy the hearts of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

My colleague has already made advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are board games, this being someone's personal cause. Yet I need to apologize in advance if I try to elbow in front just as with other single-minded supporters, I possess a compelling case for why my demand is the most urgent and significant. This is the request: We need an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works is not a science; it’s very subjective, and it will always generate discussions concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why film award organizations avoid this approach. However, it represents an essential concession in the world of interactive entertainment, that demonstrate such variety they barely qualify as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to compete fairly, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

The major gaming awards offer these classifications covering Action, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these classifications successfully include a lot of ground, allowing placement accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for puzzle games. There’s simply nowhere to accommodate them. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, showing diverse approaches: structural challenges from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. What category would fit them between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games released every year without proper recognition at major award shows, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging Indie races.

• An iconic brain-teaser got overlooked for anything in 2014
• Another creative title received no nominations in 2019
• Popular arranging title was overlooked in 2021
• Just some puzzle games barely qualified for independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're modest productions, but the art in brain-teasers is of massive significance. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most engaged experiences in the world maintaining this status for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title challenges well-known building titles competing to become best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, and engaging across multiple categories.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. You could fill five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games annually without trouble — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude many worthy titles.

To emphasize again, these represent titles lacking appropriate categories at major gaming awards. Logic title developers are working at the hard edge game development, creating some of essential manifestations of the video game form. Just like film action specialists, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay decades.