🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the month is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to scrub African American heritage and legacy from the archives is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how little it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the past when it ignores the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.